Sunday, May 27, 2018

The Birth Of A Web Site

26 May 2008 marked the birth of Gambia affairs website namely, gambiaaafirs.bogspot.com.

In a country voices resides in the people. An independent people are the architects of their own destiny. Their voices must not be silent.Their minds must not yield to slumber. They must stand vigil and exercise permanent scrutiny on how the affairs of their country are managed.

The voices of the people must have authority to determine the policies and programmes of government which manage their affairs. The government must be transparent and accountable to its people. The Gambia Affairs blog will aim to be the vehicle on which the Gambian people can travel towards greater transparency.
This blog is written by journalists from different Gambian newspapers.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Gambia Affairs:State Media Accuse Tsvangirai of Bribing Private Media

Morgan Tsvangirai claims he is victim of plot to discredit him as second marriage lasts 12 days
Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai
FABRICATIONS by ZANU PF and the state media it controls that Prime
Minister Morgan Tsvangirai and his MDC-T party were bribing the private
media to give them favourable publicity ahead of forthcoming national
elections were the highlight of the media's coverage of party political activities
in the month.
These unsubstantiated allegations first appeared on the national television
station, ZTV, on January 4th on its 8pm main news bulletin. The station
claimed, without providing a shred of evidence, that the Prime Minister "has
once again come under the spotlight" after it emerged that he had "bribed
three editors" from the local private Press "to stop the negative reportage
of his party and his promiscuous behaviour". ZTV reported Tsvangirai as
having offered the three editors "thousands of dollars", in what it described
as Tsvangirai's "latest desperate attempt to redeem his soiled image,
which has seen him being condemned for supporting gay rights and his
glaring failure to handle his bedroom politics". It also claimed that the PM
"ordered" the editors to "redirect their negative reports to ZANU PF and
attack officials who dare question (his) blundering recklessness…" such
as Presidential spokesman George Charamba and ZANU PF Politburo
member Jonathan Moyo.
Instead of seeking comment from Tsvangirai and his party or the 'three
editors', ZTV attempted to give some credibility to its claims two days later
(6/1, 8pm) by roping in pro-ZANU PF commentators such as Gabriel Chaibva
and Goodson Nguni 'confirming' the allegations. These sources, which ZTV
paraded as "political analysts…privy to the issue", identified the bribed
editors as Stanely Gama (Daily News) and Brian Mangwende, Faith Zaba and
Nevanji Madanhire (Alpha Media Holdings, publishers of the Independent,
The Standard and NewsDay).
These allegations were contained in seven of the 20 stories the government
media carried on the activities of the MDC-T. Seventeen (85%) of these 20
stories were negative, while the remaining three were neutral.
The official state media allocated 102 reports to ZANU PF, 90 (88%) of which
were positive. The remaining 12 were neutral. The smaller MDC formation,
led by Industry Minister Welshman Ncube received coverage in one report,
which was neutral. The report was a follow-up on the defection of five MPs
from the MDC-N (Chronicle, 24/1).
Forty-three (42%) of the 102 reports on ZANU PF were on its provincial
elections for the Mashonaland West, which John Mafa won, and preparations
for the president's birthday by the 21st February Movement. Another 25 were
news stories reporting ZANU PF allies, such as Anglican Archbishop Norbert
Kunonga expressing support for President Mugabe and his ZANU PF party.
The remaining 34 reports were mostly opinion pieces, news features and
editorial comments depicting ZANU PF as the champion of the interests of the
black majority, citing its controversial black economic empowerment
programme; anti-gay stance, and the provision of farming inputs to
underprivileged farmers.
On the other hand, the private media gave Tsvangirai and his party and the
editors from the private Press the opportunity to respond to the bribery
allegations. All of them dismissed the claims as false and a ploy by ZANU PF
to discredit its critics ahead of national elections (Daily News and The
Standard, 6, 7 & 8/1).
In addition, the private media assessed the strengths and weaknesses of the
policies of the three coalition parties, as well as their readiness for elections.
For instance, these media quoted a wide cross-section of Zimbabweans
questioning the implementation of the indigenization policy and complaining
that most of the party's campaign tactics were bordering on coercion and
vote-buying, as the party reportedly intensifies its efforts to reclaim lost
constituencies, especially in rural areas. They cited as proof the provision of
farming inputs; partisan food distribution; alleged coercion of villagers to
attend meetings; and reports that the party was doling out positions to
villagers during its ongoing restructuring exercise (Zimbabwe Independent,
NewsDay and Daily News, 13, 16 & 25/1).
The private media (and the official media too) criticized the MDC-T for its lack
of public relations skills, recently exposed by Public Service Minister Lucia
Matibenga's angry reaction to The Herald (19/1), which had asked her to give
an update on what her ministry was doing to avert the civil servants strike
(The Standard, Radio VoP and Daily News, 22, 24 & 25/1). In response,
Matibenga was quoted as telling the government daily to leave her alone,
provoking outrage from civil servants' unions, analysts and opposition political
parties, who viewed her actions as "in bad taste" and a reflection of
"arrogance" and lack of commitment to the welfare of civil servants (The
Herald, 19/1 and ZTV, 24/1, 8pm).
This was reflected in the 74 reports the private media carried on the activities
of the country's main political parties. Fifty-three (72%) of them were on ZANU
PF, while 12 were on the MDC-T. The remaining nine were on the MDC-N.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Gambia Affairs:Gambian Journalist Harassed For Reporting Farmers' Complaints


N


Momodou S. Jallow



New York, January 10, 2012-Police in Gambia are harassing a journalist for reporting farmers' complaints against a local official accused of mismanaging public resources, according to local journalists and news reports.

A plainclothes police officer picked up reporter Momodou S. Jallow of the private Daily News on Friday while he was covering a public meeting of a local rice growers' cooperative in Brikamaba village in central Gambia, Jallow told CPJ. The journalist said he was detained for five hours in Basang police station and accused of "inciting violence" with a January 4 story based on interviews with local farmers who accuse a local official, Chief Mamadou Lamin Baldeh, of mismanaging public assets.

Jallow reported back to the police station on Monday and was told to report back again next Monday, according to local journalists. He has not been charged. The Daily News on Monday quoted Gambian National Police Spokesman Yerro Mballow as saying Jallow would be taken to court and charged with one count of libel, a criminal offense.

"Gambian police must immediately stop harassing Momodou Jallow for giving voice to farmers' grievances," said CPJ Africa Advocacy Coordinator Mohamed Keita. "Repeatedly summoning a journalist to court and threatening him with charges is intimidation designed to silence criticism."

In Jallow's story in the Daily News, a rice farmer accused Chief Baldeh of misallocating a ticket sponsored by President Yahya Jammeh to travel to the annual Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca, known as the hajj. The article also cited farmers raising questions about Baldeh's management of the finances of a local cooperative.

###
CPJ is a New York-based, independent, nonprofit organization
that works to safeguard press freedom worldwide.

Monday, December 19, 2011

Gambia Affairs:Pursuing Justice for Gambia’s Deyda Hydara



By


The following entry first appeared on the CPJ Blog of our friends at the Committee to Protect Journalists, an independent, nonprofit organization which promotes press freedom worldwide by defending the rights of journalists to report the news without fear of reprisal:
December 16 marks the seventh anniversary of the killing of Deyda Hydara, the dean of Gambian journalism. It is also the 20th anniversary of the first issue of The Point, the courageously independent-minded daily that Hydara founded and directed for many years. He was murdered in a drive-by shooting as he drove himself and two staff members home from an evening of somber celebration at The Point's premises. He had received multiple death threats in the preceding weeks and months. In his last column, he vowed to keep fighting to the end for Gambians' right to speak their minds.
During his last years, Deyda Hydara was best known for two probing weekly columns. "The Bite" covered a broad range of matters of general interest. "Good Morning, Mr. President" discussed issues of governance and mismanagement, in a polite but incisive tone aimed directly at President Yahya Jammeh, the former junior army officer who has ruled the country since taking over in a coup 17 years ago. Treating Jammeh and his deputies as fallible, fellow human beings reportedly did not go down well at the presidential palace. While The Point continued to carry both columns for some time after Hydara's death, the intelligence service told the paper's management in 2006 that the outlet would be shut down if "Good Morning, Mr. President" was not discontinued.
The shutdown of media outlets and unpunished violence against media professionals are not exceptional events in the Gambia. In fact, being an independent-minded reporter in Jammeh's republic is a greater health hazard than perhaps anywhere else in the African continent. A few months before the Hydara shooting, in the summer of 2004, BBC reporter Ebrima Sillah was almost killed in an arson attack. The premises of The Independent newspaper were also set on fire, allegedly by members of the presidential guard, before the paper was finally shut down by the police, the entire management was rounded up, and its chief editor, Musa Saidykhan, brutally tortured--apparently for having complained to South African then-President Thabo Mbeki, at the time head of the African Union, about the media freedom situation in the Gambia.
Not surprisingly, not a single person has been brought to justice in all these years for attacks on journalists and other Jammeh critics, including Hydara. The president assigned the investigation of the Hydara shooting to the intelligence service, an agency better known for torturing, disappearing, and intimidating the victims of such crimes than catching the perpetrators. The report on their Hydara "investigation" devoted several pages to discussing the victim's private life, but gave almost no details on crime scene findings, ballistics, or potential political motives.
The regime seems to reserve a special scorn for Deyda Hydara's audacities, even post mortem. Jammeh tends to dismiss questions about the unsolved crime by pointing out, for example, that lots of people get killed in the Gambia every year. He attacked The Point, publicly and viscerally, for maintaining a "Who Killed Deyda Hydara?" banner on the front page. On the second anniversary of Deyda's death, the Gambia Press Union put up commemorative posters all over Banjul, calling for justice; they were all taken down overnight. And in January 2007, more than two years after his death, the Hydara family told me that the police refused to provide them with a death certificate so they could claim Deyda's life insurance (as an international correspondent). Not even death pays for one's political sins in the Gambia.
This month, my organization, the Open Society Justice Initiative, filed a lawsuit against the Gambian government, on behalf of the Hydara family, with a West African regional court. The court filing argues that not only has the Gambian government failed to conduct a proper investigation into the shooting, but that it contributed to the attack on his life (among others) by tolerating a general climate of impunity for violence against critics of the regime.
President Jammeh recently claimed re-election to another term in office, amid a chorus of electoral fraud allegations. ECOWAS, the West African states' organization, refused to send an observer mission, in protest against the lack of even minimal conditions for free and fair elections. Responding to charges of violent suppression of dissent, the president likes to say that his conscience is clean and that he fears "only Allah." In the meantime, the Hydara family and many others in the region are looking for some overdue, earthly justice from the ECOWAS Court.
This is the third case before the ECOWAS Court involving attacks against Gambian journalists, with the tribunal having already found the government responsible for the disappearance of Ebrima Manneh and the torturing of Saidykhan. The Gambian government has failed to comply with either ruling. It is time for the ECOWAS Community to decide whether the Jammeh government meets the minimal conditions for membership in a democratic club.

Friday, December 16, 2011

Gambia Affairs:Deyda Hydara: Seven Years of Impunity


By D. A. Jawo a veteran Gambian Journalist
This is yet another anniversary of the assassination of prominent Gambian journalist, Deyda Hydara, the seventh year since he was brutally murdered by unknown assailants, and yet, there is no indication that the Gambian authorities have any intentions to investigate the case with a view to apprehending those responsible for this heinous crime.
It is unfortunate however that every time President Jammeh comments on the case, he makes remarks which tend to confuse rather than clarify his government's stand point on the issue. A case in point was his last interview with the BBC in which he compared Deyda's brutal murder to the deaths of other Gambians in road accidents.

We can all recall the so-called 'Confidential Report' that was released in 2005 in which the authorities chose to subject Deyda's personal character to all sorts of disparaging comments, even to the extent of blaming his death on his wayward behaviour. The least anyone expected from the authorities was to show commitment in thoroughly investigating the case with a view to bringing the culprits to justice. Therefore, their failure to do so tantamount to shirking their responsibilities to a bona fide Gambian citizen.


From the very beginning, the Gambia Press Union and other civil society groups had called on the authorities to invite more competent investigating bodies from abroad to help our security forces to unravel the case, but they always turned down the call, saying that the security forces have the competence to carry out the investigation, and yet so far, they have failed to carry out any serious investigation. There is no doubt that if the government had agreed to such a proposal, then by now the truth would have been known as to who killed him and why.


Therefore, in view of the lack of any sign of commitment on the part of the Gambian authorities to investigate this heinous crime or invite other competent bodies for help, we are left with no other option but to call on regional bodies like ECOWAS and the African Union, or even the United Nations and the international community to assume their responsibilities and ensure that justice is done.

Gambia Affairs:Gambia Press Union Statement On The 7th Anniversary Of The Murder Of Deyda Hydara

Emil Touray President of The Gambia Press Union

Compatriots, Fellow Journalists and Friends of the Media,December 16th marks seven years after Deyda Hydara, co-proprietor and managing editor of the Point Newspaper was assassinated in a drive-by shooting. Yet the gunmen behind this nefarious act are yet to be arrested and brought to book.


It is imperative herein that the Government of the Gambia expends all its efforts and tools to investigate this matter in order to bring the culprits to book. Failure to bring the perpetrators of this heinous crime to book will only entrench a culture of impunity in our society. The Gambia Government and indeed all Gambians need to realize that a culture of impunity in any society threatens the very security and safety of the life of each and every one in that society, sooner or later. What happened to Deyda can happen to any other Gambian at any time. It is the responsibility of the Government to protect the right to life of all Gambians as enshrined in Section 18 of our constitution. Thus the Government of the Gambia should move heaven and earth to bringing these criminals to book as this barbaric act has no place in a civilized democratic society.

The murder of Deyda is a fundamental human rights violation that goes against the very essence of our constitution and all regional and international instruments that the Gambia has ratified. These include the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights, hence the responsibility to ensure justice prevails and the protection of human rights in our society lies squarely in the hands of the Government. Given the fact that the Gambia Government has several progressive allies in the world, we recommend that the Government should solicit support from the international community to enable her to unearth the truth.

It should be noted that journalists like all other sectors and professionals are legitimate and have a right to contribute their quota to national development. We serve a crucial role not only in bringing the state closer to the citizenry but also promote the creation of an open society where democracy and good governance flourish. The accomplishment of our crucial role would be hard to come by when rogue elements in the midst of society who negate the work of journalists enjoy the fruits of impunity

The killers of Deyda Hydara must be brought to justice.


Sign:

Gibairu Janneh

Secretary General

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Gambia Affairs.EU Vows To Help Online Dissidents Speak Out

The European Union has unveiled a strategy called 'No-Disconnect' to help online activists living under oppressive regimes get their message out without fear of state surveillance.A man with a laptop in China

Called the "No-Disconnect" strategy, the new European Union plan announced Monday aims to enable Internet activists operating under oppressive regimes to communicate safely and anonymously outside the reach of governments. However, European officials are yet to precisely explain how these tools will be created, distributed, or evaluated.


Neelie Kroes, the EU's digital affairs commissioner outlined the four-part "No-Disconnect" plan in a speech on Monday in Brussels. the European Union's digital affairs commissioner Neelie Kroes

Kroes said online freedom is closely linked to democracy

The new strategy includes developing technology to enhance privacy, teaching activists how to use it, developing on-the-ground intelligence to monitor the level of surveillance and censorship and promoting cooperation between governments, the private sector and activists.
"I want the EU to help develop and distribute those tools, in a framework that ensures the legitimacy of our action," Kroes said.
Kroes said the tools need to be simple and ready to use so they can be deployed quickly by activists with minimal technical knowledge and training.
The tools should also be readily accessible, she said, not just from computers, but from mobile phones, social networks, and micro-blogging services, like Twitter.
Many Internet experts believe social networking websites played a role in fomenting the revolutions of the Arab Spring this year, helping topple authoritarian regimes in Egypt and Tunisia.
"The Arab Spring was a wake-up call for all of us," Kroes said at the Freedom Online conference held last week, in The Hague, the Netherlands.
"[This is] a reminder that democracy is not just a rich world luxury – but something which people hope and struggle for everywhere," she added. "And a reminder that, across the world, information and communications technology can support freedom of speech and enable the peaceful transition to democracy."
Egytian blogger Wael Ghonim

Egyptian blogger Wael Ghonim played a prominent role in the uprisingMesh network on the way
The EU's push to support online freedom follows similar initiatives by the United States earlier this year to fund and develop alternate digital communications networks to help dissidents bypass state-controlled censorship.
Separately, the Dutch government has pledged one million euros ($1.3 million) to develop "mesh network" technology that can use devices like cellphones or personal computers to create a backup system to disseminate information in the event governments shut down Internet and mobile phone service.
Iran, Syria and Zimbabwe are reported to be target countries.
Walking a fine line
Though details of the EU digital freedom strategy remain sketchy, Internet rights advocates have welcomed it as a step in the right direction.
"I'm glad the European Union is taking a stance on Internet freedom. It helps highlight just how important the issue is," said Markus Beckedahl, editor of a popular German-language blog that focuses on digital issues, in an interview with Deutsche Welle.
But at the same time, he added, the EU is trying to walk a fine line: on the one hand it's helping activists in repressive nations help bypass state-controlled censorship.
On the other EU member nations impose curbs on online speech within its own borders when it comes to downloading music, blocking websites to fight child pornography or gathering information on its citizens to combat terrorism.
Datacables connected to a server

Internet activists say western governments also block web content"It's very hard to lecture a country like China about censoring Internet content when governments in Europe too are blocking access to certain things," echoed Joe McNamee, head of European Digital Rights, a Brussels-based Internet advocacy organization. "This is the trickiest challenge for the EU – it simply has to be consistent to be credible."
Activists have also criticized the United States for its "Stop Online Piracy Act" proposed by Congress, which would require American telecommunications companies to block access to foreign-based websites that infringe American copyright.
Western tech firms complicit in Internet monitoring
Others point out that any EU efforts to champion Internet freedom are undermined by the fact that western companies export surveillance technology to authoritarian governments. WikiLeaks recently began publishing extensive internal documents from companies around the globe that engage in these types of surveillance.
Stephan Urbach of Telecomix, a decentralized network of Internet freedom activists, said his group had discovered earlier this year that the Syrian government was using web filters developed by US technology company Blue Coat Systems. In another instance, a Munich company reportedly sold Internet monitoring technology to the Egyptian government.
Stephen Urbach

Stephan Urbach and his colleagues at Telecomix have tried to help activists stay online"This is a real problem," Urbach told Deutsche Welle. "The Western world sells this kind of monitoring hardware all across the Middle East."
Both the European Union and the US have in recent days urged technology companies to be transparent about equipment they sell to government who might use it to repress their citizens.
"I think it is high time for the industry to decide where they stand, and what they are going to do. If not as a moral issue, then as an issue of corporate reputation," Kroes said. "Being known for selling despots the tools of their repression is, to say the least, bad PR."
Helping existing activists   
Though the EU hasn't said how much it intends to invest in its "No Disconnect" strategy, experts say any funds must be targeted carefully.
Beckedahl suggested that the 27-nation bloc should help finance groups such as Telecomix, which famously offered slow, but functional, dial-up Internet access to circumvent state blockages of broadband networks during the uprising in Egypt.
"If the EU is serious about supporting Internet freedom it should fund civil rights groups, open source software and groups that already do good work on the ground and are well-connected with activists in other countries so that they can improve their initiatives," he said.
Author: Sonia Phalnikar
Editor: Cyrus Farivar

 

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

GAMBIAAFFAIRS:GAMBIA:ECOWAS STATEMENT ON THE 24 NOVEMBER 2011 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN THE GAMBIA


  PRESS RELEASE

COMMUNIQUE DE PRESSE
The ECOWAS Commission has informed the President of the Gambia about its  decision not to dispatch an ECOWAS Observer Mission to the Presidential  Election scheduled to take place in the country on 24 November 2011, because  the preparations and political environment for the said election are adjudged  by the Commission not to be conducive for the conduct of free, fair and  transparent polls. In keeping with the pertinent provisions of the ECOWAS Supplementary Protocol  on Democracy and Good Governance, the President of the Commission dispatched a  fact-finding mission to the Gambia, during which the mission interacted with a  wide range of stakeholders to assess the state of preparedness of the country  for the election. The Commission has also been conducting a regular monitoring  of the political situation and preparations in the lead-up to the election  through the ECOWAS Early Warning System. Unfortunately, the reports of the fact-finding mission and the Early Warning  System paint a picture of intimidation, an unacceptable level of control of  the electronic media by the party in power, the lack of neutrality of state  and para-statal institutions, and an opposition and electorate cowed by  repression and intimidation. In the circumstance, the ECOWAS Commission is of  the view that the conditions prevailing in the country do not meet the minimum  standards set under the Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance for the  conduct of elections and has, therefore, decided to exercise the discretionary  powers conferred on the Commission's President under the Protocol to stand  down the ECOWAS Observer Mission. While regretting the decision forced upon it by the circumstances, the ECOWAS  Commission will remain seized with the situation in the Gambia, and expresses  its readiness to engage the Government and other stakeholders in the Gambian  polity, with a view to accompanying them in their endeavour to create a level  playing field for future elections.  His Excellency James Victor Gbeho President of the Commission	

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Gambia Affairs:Gambia:Media Group Condemns Police in NY Protest

image
By Mariano Andrade
NEW YORK, November 16, 2011 (AFP) - A US media group condemned New York police Wednesday for their treatment of journalists covering the eviction of Occupy Wall Street protesters in the city.
About half a dozen journalists were arrested during and soon after Tuesday's massive police operation against the protest tent camp in Zuccotti Park, in the Financial District.
The arrests were among more than 200 overall as police rounded up demonstrators refusing to leave the park and another location that was briefly taken over by the crowd.
The Society of Professional Journalists issued a statement calling for dropping charges against journalists arrested in New York and in similar protests in other US states.
"SPJ calls for all charges against these journalists to be dropped and for greater care by police to avoid arresting or otherwise obstructing journalists who are simply and clearly doing their jobs," the statement said.
"We know that as protests escalate it may be difficult for police to distinguish bystanders from participants, but it is clear now that many journalists have been erroneously arrested without cause," SPJ President John Ensslin said.
Another CPJ official, Carlos Lauria, said he was "alarmed" and criticized restrictions on media access to the immediate site of the New York eviction. "It is particularly disturbing that government officials sought to block any coverage of the event at all," he said.
Reporters and camera crews were allowed to observe the eviction of the camp from across the street and could talk to departing protesters. But they were not allowed into the interior of the square where police were removing tents and expelling the demonstrators.
One freelance camerawoman, who asked not to be identified, said she was arrested for "obstructing pedestrian traffic" near Zuccotti Park. Although she was soon released, she must go before a judge in January.
"During my detention I was not allowed to make a call, so my boss didn't know anything about me for three hours," she said.
Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said five journalists were arrested. He denied that any rights were violated, saying the reporters had been trespassing, along with demonstrators, on private property in an incident after the Zuccotti Park eviction, and had then refused to leave.
"They were arrested with the demonstrators. I think there was confusion on their part as to just what they're allowed to do. They're private citizens -- they were technically trespassing. That was worked out and their arrests were voided," Kelly said in an interview with NY1 television.
Regarding restrictions on movement of reporters at the eviction itself, Kelly said that was normal.
"We never allow reporters to go into the scene of an operation. It's like having them go into a crime scene," he said.

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Gambia Affairs:Gambia:US Senator Durbin Presses Gambian Government on Chief Ebrima Manneh


 

Durbin Press Release                      Masthead

 

For Immediate Release

Contact: Max Gleischman

202.228.5244

November 2, 2011

 

DURBIN PRESSES GAMBIAN GOVERNMENT ON CHIEF MANNEH CASE

Applauds British Role in Investigating the Disappearance of Gambian Journalist

 

[WASHINGTON, D.C.] – Assistant Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin (D-IL) sent a letter today to the Gambian Attorney General, Edward Gomez, requesting information about Chief Ebrima Manneh, a Gambian journalist who has been missing for more than five years. According to recent comments by Attorney General Gomez, Manneh, who many worried had died while in Gambian custody, is alive.

 

"I am writing to request immediate information regarding Chief Ebrima Manneh, a Gambian journalist with the Daily Observer who has been missing since a troubling detention by Gambian security personnel more than five years ago.  In light of your recent comments claiming that Manneh is alive -- a stark contrast from previous Gambian government silence and denials regarding his whereabouts -- I ask that you immediately provide any information regarding Manneh's location and condition," Durbin wrote to AG Gomez."If Chief Manneh is, in fact, alive, and you do have knowledge of his whereabouts, helping  to resolve his disappearance could add credibility to your recent comments at the 50th session of the African Commission on Human and People's Rights, during which you spoke of the need to "speak out against human rights abuses."   Sadly, without an immediate accounting for Mr. Manneh, those words will ring hollow in Gambia and around the world."

 

Durbin also wrote to British Foreign Secretary William Hague, expressing his strong support for the United Kingdom's role in investigating Chief Manneh's case.

 

Durbin wrote; "I respectfully ask you to investigate Chief Manneh's disappearance and urge you to continue to press the Gambian government to respect its international commitments as a member of both the UN and the Commonwealth in this case."

 

Chief Manneh was reportedly detained in July 2006 for political reasons by plainclothes police officers thought to have been from the Gambian National Intelligence Agency.  Some reports suggest that he has being held at the Fatoto Police Station in eastern Gambia, at Mile Two Prison, or a National Intelligence Agency compound in Serekunda.  In July 2007, he was also reportedly escorted by members of the Gambian Police Intervention Unit to the Royal Victoria Teaching Hospital in Banjul for high blood pressure treatment. He has not been seen since.

 

Both the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Community Court of Justice and the UN Human Rights Council's Working Group on Arbitrary Detention have called for the immediate release of Mr. Manneh.

 

Durbin, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights, has been pressing for Chief Manneh's release for several years.

 

Copies of today's letters are attached.

Gambia Affairs:Gambia:Senator Durbin Presses Gambian Government on Chief Ebrima Manneh Case


Durbin Press Release Masthead

 

For Immediate Release

Contact: Max Gleischman

202.228.5244

November 2, 2011

 

DURBIN PRESSES GAMBIAN GOVERNMENT ON CHIEF MANNEH CASE

Applauds British Role in Investigating the Disappearance of Gambian Journalist

 

Senator Dick Durbin


[WASHINGTON, D.C.] – Assistant Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin (D-IL) sent a letter today to the Gambian Attorney General, Edward Gomez, requesting information about Chief Ebrima Manneh, a Gambian journalist who has been missing for more than five years. According to recent comments by Attorney General Gomez, Manneh, who many worried had died while in Gambian custody, is alive.

 

"I am writing to request immediate information regarding Chief Ebrima Manneh, a Gambian journalist with the Daily Observer who has been missing since a troubling detention by Gambian security personnel more than five years ago.  In light of your recent comments claiming that Manneh is alive -- a stark contrast from previous Gambian government silence and denials regarding his whereabouts -- I ask that you immediately provide any information regarding Manneh's location and condition," Durbin wrote to AG Gomez."If Chief Manneh is, in fact, alive, and you do have knowledge of his whereabouts, helping  to resolve his disappearance could add credibility to your recent comments at the 50th session of the African Commission on Human and People's Rights, during which you spoke of the need to "speak out against human rights abuses."   Sadly, without an immediate accounting for Mr. Manneh, those words will ring hollow in Gambia and around the world."

 

Durbin also wrote to British Foreign Secretary William Hague, expressing his strong support for the United Kingdom's role in investigating Chief Manneh's case.

 

Durbin wrote; "I respectfully ask you to investigate Chief Manneh's disappearance and urge you to continue to press the Gambian government to respect its international commitments as a member of both the UN and the Commonwealth in this case."

 

Chief Manneh was reportedly detained in July 2006 for political reasons by plainclothes police officers thought to have been from the Gambian National Intelligence Agency.  Some reports suggest that he has being held at the Fatoto Police Station in eastern Gambia, at Mile Two Prison, or a National Intelligence Agency compound in Serekunda.  In July 2007, he was also reportedly escorted by members of the Gambian Police Intervention Unit to the Royal Victoria Teaching Hospital in Banjul for high blood pressure treatment. He has not been seen since.

 

Both the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Community Court of Justice and the UN Human Rights Council's Working Group on Arbitrary Detention have called for the immediate release of Mr. Manneh.

 

Durbin, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights, has been pressing for Chief Manneh's release for several years.

 

Copies of today's letters are attached.


Sunday, October 16, 2011

Gambia Affairs:Gambia:Justic Minister Says Chief Manneh is Alive in An Exclusive Interview With The Daily News

Hon.Gomez tell us where Chief Manneh is kept?

What is your impression about the country's legal system?

From what perspective, the justice ministry or judiciary

Both, if you would not mind?

That is a very wide topic. I am sure by asking for this interview, you must have something in mind… you must have an idea about an aspect of the justice delivery system you want an explanation.

For instance, your take on how cases are faring in the courts amid the backlog?


Quite frankly, the best sector to answer that is the judiciary. We have prosecutors who go to courts, but the backlog of cases that are being complained about in the criminal aspect of proceedings are very few.
The backlog really pertains mostly to civil matters. But there is no system that is so perfect that cases are expeditiously treated. We try our best, but really sometimes there are factors beyond our control - a judge can be ill or a lawyer from one of the parties could be ill or travel.
So, all of these things tend to militate against the expeditious discharge of the courts in their functioning. But ordinarily, cases are proceeding with reasonable speed.

What are some of the challenges you face when you took over  the mantle at the justice ministry?


In every ministry, there are challenges. Some of them might have been there before you take over. Some might surface while you are there as minister and you may even foresee some future challenges.
When I took over as justice minister, there were some major challenges arising mainly from the position of the structure of the Ministry, the buildings needed repairs.
The main buildings housing the Registrar of Companies and Curators' offices were in a terrible state; it was leaking profusely and some of the documents had to be rescued.
And when I took over, I also have the good fortune of having a Solicitor General in the person of Pa Harry Jammeh, who is very hard working, innovative and responsive to the challenges that faced us and he really went out to ensure that all the buildings are renovated, carpeted by new furniture so that those working in those offices would feel the zeal and the desire to work in a very conducive environment with air conditioning, and even refrigerator.

Well, could you also highlight some foreseen future challenges?  


Well, the future challenges are that we really need to have more Gambian lawyers. When I say Gambian lawyers, I
mean those dedicated and prepared out of patriotic favor, to work for the benefit of The Gambia.
Most private lawyers would like to work on their own as opposed to come in and join hands with few Gambian lawyers for the improvement of the country.
They [private lawyers] tend to look at the financial gains but there are some who really are anxious to lend a helping hand. They would come and work for the country. One should not only work to line his or her pockets and not care for ones country.
If we Gambians don't stand-up to work to take this country forward, who else do we expect to come and do it for us.
We have a technical assistant from Nigeria. Nigerian lawyers are helping us, but it cannot go on forever. There must come a time when we too must felt self reliant; and that we have young Gambian lawyers who are coming and are working for us.
And in trying to address that situation, we are making the positions here more attractive as well as build some incentives so that they will be encouraged to come in, stay and work as career lawyers in the ministry of justice.

In essence, you are aspiring for an indigenised Gambian legal sector?

Indigenization of Gambian legal sector is necessary because you cannot rely on people from other nations to do your work. They may at the beginning help you to build up, but there must come a day when you have to count on your own.
 
Why did you file an application at the ECOWAS Court in Abuja for a review of the judgement against Gambia government in concluded cases of  journalists Ebrima Chief Manneh of Daily Observer and Musa Saidykhan of Independent newspaper?

Yes, while that application for a review of the judgement is on, I wouldn't comment because that may affect the case.

Is it that you were dissatisfied with the verdict of the ECOWAS court in both cases?

Yes, we were dissatisfied. Anybody has a right to ask for a review or an appeal. In ECOWAS decision, you don't appeal. There is no appellant system, but you ask for a review.

Why in the case of Manneh, the government was never represented throughout the trial at the ECOWAS court?

Government was represented. Maybe those who should have officially appeared failed to appear and there was a default judgement. Normally, if two parties are in court, one is attending all the time and the other did not attend, then there could be a default judgement. So the plaintiff could be given judgement because the defendant did not come to defend the case, but that is not the same as not been represented.

You call it a default judgement?

Yes, there was a default judgement in that Chief Ebrima Manneh's case. Yeah (laughs)… I wouldn't want to preempt, but I will tell you soon there will be very interesting developments which will also intrigue you concerning this Chief Manneh's case … laughs. Lets wait until we get there, then you will get to know.
We have no difficulties about that case and we have nothing to hide. But one thing I can tell you for sure is that we've been wrongly presented in the mass media in the world. We are not that kind of government where we just capture people and make them disappear. Soon that will come to light.

What is responsible for this 'misrepresentation'?

Because most of your colleagues will rather paint the government black. They don't tend to see the good that the government is doing. They are prepared to publish anything black and negative about the government which is not good and unfair.
We are all partners in the process of development. Yes, just as you have a duty to educate and inform, but in so doing, you should do it professionally; you should be acquainted with all the fact; what you say you must be able to prove. But you cannot just go and speculate and sensationalise in order to sell to your papers.
You are betraying your country, you are betraying the government of the day. If government does something and you have the proofs that yes government has done this, government has done that, well that is fine.
But most times, you know, you find journalists, infact I don't even quite call them journalists, you know, who will just go and publish whatever they want hoping that it will make an impact. Of course it does make a negative impact, but unfairly on the government and government officials.

Chief Manneh and Editor Musa Saidykhan's cases are not the only cases in which people complained of torture and disappearances. Look there are others such Kanyiba Kanyi, Marcie Mendy, Buba Jammeh and many others?

Did you mount any investigation?

Yes, colleagues visited families of the victims most of whom said their relatives were arrested in their present?

I can tell you with certainty that there are some family members who say that they were never ever approached by the journalism fraternity.Journalists never visited; some journalists just pick up a pen and paper and start speculating.
Everything that they put on paper is nothing but a figment of their own imagination and sometimes I would call it very 'frivolous and mischief imagination'.It's is not right. Write on something which you are sure of. And very soon you and I will have cause to sit down again and talk about Chief Manneh.
You will be ashamed what the papers wrote about Gambia and the Gambia government. I am telling you with high degree of certainty, and these are facts. You and I have a moral duty and a legal duty as well that when things are published and reach public domain it should be based on facts and not fiction.
It should not be a reflection of a man's hatred or dislike of an institution or government. It should be based on facts.
You and I, we have moral conscience, so talk about what you know, talk about what you've seen and not what you've been told by somebody who has evil mind and a desire.
You should be very careful. When I say you I don't mean you in particular, I mean you the journalists. You have a duty to educate and to inform for goodness sake, but in so doing, go by the ethics of your profession.

Musa Saidykhan was the Editor-In-Chief of the defunct Independent newspaper; he was arrested and tortured while under the custody of National Intelligence Agency…?

(cuts in) He was allegedly tortured. You are talking as if you were there. Even the way you talking, you are making a clear exposition that even if hearsay evidence, you treat it as if you were there. And he who alleges must prove.

Chief Manneh was said to be arrested in the presence of one of his colleagues who had testified at the ECOWAS court in Abuja. Now, saying that these two cases Saidykhan and Manneh are not genuine cases is quite startling?

Now, let me tell with a high degree of certainty, Chief Ebrima Manneh is somewhere not in the custody of The Gambia government or any official of The Gambia government. But we will cross our bridge, when we get to it, then some of you journalists will be ashamed of what you've published.
But let the right time come that's all I can tell you. We shall talk about this case at a later stage when it is more convenient; when I can prove to you beyond reasonable doubt the lies, the intrigues, the ill feeling, the negative feeling of some of your colleagues.We shall address that at a later stage, but I can tell when that day comes, many of you journalists will be looking for a hiding place and you can't find any.

You said Chief Manneh should be somewhere, where is he?

Don't worry, well we will come to that. And he is not in the custody of the Gambia government; we are not detaining him at all. But now when the right time comes you will see the dishonesty and lack of conscience on the part of people from your own side?

Is he alive?

Well, I can tell you Chief Ebrima Manneh is alive.

Have you heard from him?

That is what I am telling you, I am not going into full details yet, but when the right time comes you people will swallow back the venom that you've been spitting out.
That's all I can tell you. You've tried to do a lot of damage to the image of The Gambia government but without success. We are doing our work meticulously and with a sense of dignity, that's all I can tell you.

Chief Manneh's case is very serious issue, US Senators called for his release…?

(cuts in) These US Senators have a lot to talk about, they should talk about the extraordinary renditions when people were arrested in different countries and flown to different locations and tortured and some died.
Let the US Senators address those issues rather than talk about Chief Manneh. Let the US Senators talk about former president George W. Bush who in conspiracy with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair said that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and they took preemptive actions and attacked that country against all international laws, removed the head of state, had him decapitated and until today not a single weapon of mass destruction were produced.
Let them talk about that. Why don't they talk about that? Why don't the US Senators talk about taking George W. Bush to International Criminal Court (ICC)? Why not Tony Blair? You've heard of ABU GRAVE PRISON and the atrocities that took place there, let them talk about that.
Look, I find it rather childish when you [journalists] are being hoodwinked and circumvented to talk about the frivolous and unfair accusations they brought about the Gambia when they themselves have a lot of despicable acts which they are not talking about.
Now you are telling me that the US Senators said this, the US talk about that. You are the people who should answer to them. Tell them: look before you talk about Gambia look at yourselves, you are all covered in mud and filth and you come and look at me and say I am dirty.

Perhaps the US Senators spoke about it because our own government was not opening up with regards to Chief Manneh's case?

So they were open to speak up? You've heard of the recent scandals that happened, they were sitting on so many evil things. Even some of them (prisoners) were taken to Libya and tortured in Libya. Come on….you keep someone at Guantanamo Bay for four years and say that you suspect he has committed an act of terrorism.
After four years, you release him, tell him go we find nothing against you. How about compensation? You've ruined that man's life for four years; you've taken four years away from his precious life, treated him like a dog, urinated on him, and put faeces on him in the cell, even the Holy Quran they urinated on it.
We as black people are intelligent enough. Let them not come and tell us rubbish and you listen to them and start writing nonsense about your own country. Come on, you are far too intelligent for that.
Infact, some British so-called members of the parliament started saying that they going to ask for the Gambia to be sanctioned on X Y and Z. Rubbish! Rubbish! Why don't they sanction themselves?

What do you think they want to sanction Gambia for?

Well, they know. Ask them, they will tell you.

Is it because of Gambia's reported grave violations of human rights?

Maybe you should ask them. Carry out some investigative journalism, talk to them, ask them. I believe it was your paper [The Daily News] that reported that some British Members of Parliament say that I am the 'Minister of injustice' and it was published in your paper.
What a disrespect! Even if they are saying it, I don't think you people should denigrate your own minister of justice not to mention your own minister of justice.
Why don't you call Tony Blair, the prime minister of injustice, the prime minister of deceit and lies, why didn't you?

He and George Bush deceived the whole world and they lied why didn't you call them that? But you have the audacity to turn round and to publish what they said that I am the minister of injustice and you put it there and you enjoyed printing it.
But I wouldn't answer. It is about time, you people come to realise that you don't allow white people or people outside this country to look at you as inferior and stupid and then they coax you to write stupid things about your own leaders.

We are your leaders, we are your ministers, and we formed the government. And it is our duty to take this country forward and we are doing that to the best of our ability, but you people don't seem to appreciate that.
Idiots will sit down there and dictate to you what to write in order to make a mockery of your leaders and you are happy to do that. Put pen on paper and publish it.
I would have declined an interview with The Daily News since you have the audacity to print that the British MPs say that I am the minister of injustice.
And even the British High Commissioner at the time mockingly told me: 'hey hey, I saw it in The Daily News they call you minister of injustice'.
He enjoyed it, but you guys gave him the leverage to do that. Yes, this is where I am calling your attention.
You should know who you are and you should learn to respect, appreciate and cherish who you are. You should learn to appreciate your country. You should learn to appreciate your leadership.
I am not involved in any form of eulogy I am telling you the truth. We in the Gambia should thank God the almighty for having a leader like President Yahya Jammeh. This is a patriotic leader; this is a god fearing leader; this is a man who has given you a university; this is man who has given probably the best airport in West Africa; this is a man who has given you a training hospital where your doctors will be trained; this is a man who has given you a university where now lawyers will train until they put on their wig and gown and go to court; this is a man who has taken agriculture forward, he bought tractors and gave it to the whole country and say go and farm so that you eat what you grow and make you food self sufficient. What more do you want? The West are not happy that we have such a patriotic leader, they want somebody who will go begging, asking for money.

President Jammeh says he is not going to beg anybody, can't you see and appreciate that. What more do you want? Look at the whole of Africa which country can boast of a good leader than the one we have?
Let President Jammeh leaves State House to go, the crowd will be seized with enthusiasm, with happiness and joy. Everybody will be shouting and it is genuine, it is not cosmetic.
These are things we should see and appreciate. Somebody cannot come and tell you look the chicken you have in your compound are no good, throw them away and kill them I have a better chicken when you go and look at his chicken they are almost half dying, they are all full of disease.

Is the government of the Gambia thinking of repealing anti free media laws – the law on false publication, sedition among others?

Now you see I told you that I had an appointment at State House now I am almost late, I've got fifteen minutes and that is bit too risky. From here to State House there could be a bit of traffic jam.
In fact, I have got only ten minutes to be there so we can suspend this interview until some other time.

Author: Saikou Ceesay